[Radiant] About page caching

Mohit Sindhwani tech at onghu.com
Sun Mar 30 07:34:07 CDT 2008


Peter Haza wrote:
> Hi
>
> 1. Your counter is an external javascript and is out of radiant's 
> control whatsoever because it is the client(browser) calling the 
> script, not radiant(server).
> A possible solution to this is to make radiant(server) make the call, 
> but that would probably require some ruby/rails programming.
>
> 2,3. I would believe these would be cached, as I presume they use a 
> feed /aggregator that is caching the results, but don't quote me on this.
> Best to wait and see if someone else can give a definitive answer.
>
> It's important to notice the difference between 1 and 2,3.
> Whereas 1 outputs javascript, the dynamics happen on the client 
> side(browser) and out of radiant's control,
> while 2,3 does the magic on the server side (hence it's cachable by 
> radiant)
>
> So bottom line if I am correct:
>
> 1. Unaffected by caching
> 2. Affected
> 3. Affected
>
> ph
Thanks Peter,

That ties with my understanding also.  I do hope that I'll get another 
response.

While we're at it, would IFRAME help?  I've heard that word thrown 
around from time to time and I haven't yet got around to checking it 
out... or how to use it from within a Radiant site at this stage.

Cheers,
Mohit.
3/30/2008 | 8:34 PM.




More information about the Radiant mailing list