[Radiant] page_attachments experience

[Andrew O'Brien]

I'm pretty happy with page_attachments.  The biggest headache for me
was installing RMagick or image_science on my Mac dev machine (I don't
know why this is still such a pain in the a$$!).  It's running great
on my Ubuntu Server though.

Usability-wise, the thumbnails it adds to the page admin interface are
really good.  As are the <r:attachment:*> tags.  My only complaint is
that styles seem just a little bit off from the rest of the UI, but
all things considered, that's not too bad.

I recommend you use it.  For what it sounds like you want to do, it's perfect.

-Andrew

On Jan 2, 2008 4:21 PM, Bill Barnard <bill at barnard-engineering.com> wrote:
> I'm curious how well page_attachments has worked for others. I'm going
> to give it a try in my test environment, but wondering how it's worked
> for end users who may or may not be computer savvy (from a programmer's
> perspective).
>
> Are there any other options, aside from writing my own extension,
> currently available to make it easy for end users to add images to the
> pages they create?
>
> Thank you for any comments!
>
> Bill
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post:   Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>