[Radiant] About page caching

[Mohit Sindhwani]

Sean Cribbs wrote:
> Mohit,
>
> An IFRAME shouldn't be necessary.  For reference, an IFRAME is an HTML 
> tag that works like a frameset but is "inline".  So essentially it 
> would be requesting the results of a separate page entirely, which 
> gets around your caching issue.  However, sometimes the integration of 
> those can be sticky.
>
> Regarding #2 and #3, they will work (assuming all the correct plumbing 
> is there), it's just that they won't refresh but every 5 minutes (or 
> however often you specify).  That is part of the rationale behind the 
> 5-minute cache -- balancing performance with timeliness.  It also lets 
> us judo the whole cache-dependency issues you might see in Rails apps 
> that do lots of caching.  Out of date?  No problem, it'll be refreshed 
> in 5 minutes -- no need to automatically clear the 
> child/parent/sibling/etc.  If timeliness is really an issue on those 
> pages, you can always turn the cache off for them with a special Page 
> type.
>
> Sean
>

Hi Sean

Thanks for the reply.  I apologize for the late reply but I have been 
completely tied up with non-Radiant work :(

I'll be back!

Cheers,
Mohit.
4/9/2008 | 11:42 PM.