[Radiant] Page Versioning

[Richard Hurt]

Oh oh, along the same "priorites" line - what about RadDAV?  RADiant DAV
instead of WebDAV.  :)

Also, I'm not sure but would you edit your stuff in Production or would you
just edit it in Development and then migrate it?  I'm a Rails/Radiant newb
so I envision building things out in a development environment and then
migrating them to QA -> Production.  Is that the way things operate in your
world?  I have a corporate enterprise mentality (just having recently
escaped) and it's not quite clear how we move code around in Radiant.

Later...
  Richard

On 10/2/07, Andrew O'Brien <obrien.andrew at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Just a warning: I'm probably not going to be able to get any real work
> done for a couple of days.  Sounds like a couple of people are
> interested in this though, so I figure I'll lay out what I've come up
> with so far just doing preliminary investigation:
>
> 1) I think WebDAV is the way to go, for reasons outlined above.  I
> love the idea of FUSE, but I have reservations.
>
> 2) The WebDAV server should run as a separate process so that neither
> it nor Radiant will block the other one.
>
> 3) I'm not sure how much caching can be done in this situation (or how
> hard it will be to control expiry), so I'd like to be as
> multi-threaded as possible.  Also, since this isn't going to use
> Javascript or any view functionality, I think I'd rather use a more
> minimal framework than Rails.  I'm thinking Merb (with Radiant's
> models).
>
> I'd considered Camping, but Camping is for fun stuff -- not serious
> work!  (Just kidding -- it's really because it can be a little hard to
> follow unless you have a PhD in metaprogrammology).
>
> Ok, that's what I've come up with for now.  Oh, and a cool name (see
> I've got my priorities in line): Daviant.  I just printed out RFC
> 4918, so I'm sure I'll have a better idea after I read that.
>
> http://www.webdav.org/specs/rfc4918.pdf
>
> Any feedback would be most appreciated.
>
> -Andrew
>
> On 10/2/07, Oli <radiantcms.org at boblet.net> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Andrew, I'd be really interested in seeing what you come up with for
> > either WebDAV or FUSE. This would totally solve two of my main pain
> > points with Radiant - editing templates in Textmate not the browser,
> > and moving changes from staging on localhost to the live server. If
> > it plays nicely with svn or another versioning program that would be
> > icing on the cake!
> >
> > Please keep us informed :-D
> >
> > peace - oli
> > _______________________________________________
> > Radiant mailing list
> > Post:   Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
> > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> > Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post:   Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>