[Radiant] Typo3 instead of Radiant?

[Sean Cribbs]

Ok, ok.  My message wasn't entirely fair.  At first I started writing a 
Slashdot-ish rebuttal, but got tired of reading my own ugly words.  
Still, Radiant doesn't claim to be what it's not -- don't use a wrench 
to drive in nails. Too many CMSs try to be everything to everyone and 
Radiant doesn't, which is why I love it.

Sean
> Sean,
>
> I love how you dismiss genuine claims. Am sure, because of posts in
> this list that several other people feel the same way I do. But
> whatever, it's your prerogative to keep thinking otherwise.
>
> On 1/14/07, Sean Cribbs <seancribbs at gmail.com> wrote:
>   
>> Flamebait. RadiantUsers wiki page. PDI. That is all.
>>
>> Ruben D. Orduz wrote:
>>     
>>> This is not intended as a flame or to cause controversy, please don't
>>> take it as such.
>>>
>>> I just recommended a customer to adopt Typo3 instead of Radiant CMS, why?
>>>
>>> * Mailer Behaviour is shaky at best.
>>> * Print page to PDF/PS/CSV is not even completely supported by Rails.
>>> * User roles.
>>>
>>> Those were three of the most important things that they told me they
>>> needed. They're a small-ish (~15 people) company and are not planning
>>> in having huge traffic on their site or anything. However, I had to
>>> recommend the adoption of a CMS that is probably an overkill for what
>>> they need, but with Radiant and its extensions being in such a
>>> "puerile" stage, it's too much risk telling them to adopt it.
>>>
>>> The point I'm trying to drive home is that all of us that are in some
>>> way or another involved in the development of Radiant (whether the
>>> core, extensions, documentation, etc.) need to ramp up development of
>>> Radiant if we really want to make it a production-grade CMS. I believe
>>> for what I've read as of late that a whole lot of people is interested
>>> in helping out and I sense the time is ripe for John and whoever else
>>> leads Radiant to "manage" the momentum built up to help get this baby
>>> out the door.
>>>
>>> Sorry for soapboxing, but in closing I must echo the thoughts of a
>>> list contributor who said something to the effect that if a project
>>> stagnates for too long, it eventually fades away.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Radiant mailing list
>>> Post:   Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
>>> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
>>> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> Radiant mailing list
>> Post:   Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
>> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
>> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>>
>>     
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post:   Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.radiantcms.org/pipermail/radiant/attachments/20070114/b80fdb9c/attachment.html