[Radiant] RadiantCMS, Maple Leaf Web Project
Sean Cribbs
seancribbs at gmail.com
Sat Oct 28 06:47:17 CDT 2006
Ruben D. Orduz wrote:
>
> * Comments/Feedback system. (which I beleive was mentioned in the
> presentation @ RubyCon).
>
<shameless self promotion>
It has that already, albeit a somewhat kludgy implementation. Check out
Commentable on the wiki under ThirdPartyBehaviors.
</shameless self promotion>
Sean Cribbs
seancribbs.com
> On 10/27/06, *Greg Farries* <greg at mapleleafweb.com
> <mailto:greg at mapleleafweb.com>> wrote:
>
> Erik Mallinson wrote:
> > I disagree with Ruben - the point of Radiant isn't to mature to be
> > like Drupal, Joomla! or Typo3; the point of Radiant is that it's
> > mature to exercise restraint. Radiant is for small groups of people
> > to manage a straight forward site.
>
> Well, in terms of Maple Leaf Web, we have a very small team of
> writers/editors. Including the following
>
> Admin (myself)
> Senior Editor (4)
> Managing Editor (1)
> Content Manager (2)
> Writers (4)
>
> The Senior editors, and writers won't even need access to the CMS,
> only
> myself, the managing editor and the content manager need to be able to
> add/edit content. So I think this definitely falls into the small
> team/group class.
>
> > I think it depends on what you want. If you want to have the site
> > feature the articles, Radiant is great for a site like that, (imho)
> > better than Drupal. If you want to add polls, forums, and other
> > community features, you should probably go with Drupal.
>
> Essentially, all I need the CMS to do is manage the features we
> produce.
> The Weblog, Forum, sections will all be controlled by third party
> software.
> Weblog will use Wordpress, the forum will be PunBB.
>
> > Why? Because Drupal was overkill. I spent most of the time
> > turning off features and dealing with 'the way it is' than with the
> > content itself.
>
> I agree, and this is why I initally looked at using
> Wordpress. Wordpress is
> almost what I need, as it doesn't complicate the process with a
> bunch of
> features almost no one uses.
>
>
>
> >
> > So if you're going to keep the forums and polls separate I don't
> see
> > why you couldn't use Radiant.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Radiant mailing list
> > Post: Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
> <mailto:Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org>
> > Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> > Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
> <http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post: Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
> <mailto:Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org>
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post: Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site: http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.radiantcms.org/pipermail/radiant/attachments/20061028/3ba716b5/attachment.html
More information about the Radiant
mailing list