[Radiant] Deployment without SSH?
Josh Ferguson
josh at besquared.net
Mon Aug 14 00:58:40 CDT 2006
That's true, I can't either. But I was able to reproduce it consistently
for several days using the same method. Refresh a cached page, clear the
page cache, repeat. Doing this about 3 or 4 times pushed mongrel to
about 160MB foot print. Mongrel debug logging showed a massive number of
'String' and 'Array' objects never being garbage collected. The system
was basically setup like this:
Redhat EL3
Apache 2.0.46 (I think)
Mongrel 0.3.13
sqlite3 - ruby bindings
radiant 0.5.0
Keeping everything the same and switching to postgres 8 solved the
problem and it's been running stable for about 2 weeks now. So what the
exact reason was, I don't know, but I do know that the sqlite3 ruby
bindings were the difference between leaking and not leaking.
Josh
John W. Long wrote:
> Josh Ferguson wrote:
>
>> I had bad memory leak problems using mongrel, apache, radiant and
>> mongrel. I tracked it for more than a week and could reproduce it.
>> Switching to postgres solved the memory leak completely. I'm not sure
>> what the problem was but I would suggest staying away from the sqlite3
>> bindings as for whatever reason radiant's caching causes memory leaks
>> with it.
>>
>
> You say Radiant's caching caused memory leaks. Do you say this because
> you turned it off and the problem went away or was this just a suspicion?
>
> I can't see any reason why the choice of database drivers and the
> caching mechanism would have anything to do with each other.
>
> --
> John Long
> http://wiseheartdesign.com
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Radiant at lists.radiantcms.org
> http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant
>
>
More information about the Radiant
mailing list